Political Science: Political Ideologies
Social Institutions
Government Systems
Edward G. Carmines,
Nicholas J. D'Amico,
Edward G. Carmines
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas J. D'Amico
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorEdward G. Carmines,
Nicholas J. D'Amico,
Edward G. Carmines
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorNicholas J. D'Amico
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 15 May 2015
Abstract
The past 50 years of research into political ideology has left scholars with a contested paradigm. One side, founded on the research of Philip Converse, argues that the mass public is distinctly nonideological in their thinking. The other side argues that ideological thinking is not, in fact, beyond the public and can be found in forms similar to that of political elites. The way forward for research in political ideology does not lie in rehashing this debate but in moving forward in two new areas of work. The first considers the role that values and principles play in determining the political and ideological thinking of individuals. The second questions the current measurement standards of political ideology. Rather than considering ideology as occurring along a single spectrum, ideology among the mass public is formed by positions along two separate spectrums. In this essay, we summarize the major arguments of Converse, his supporters, and his critics. Then, we discuss recent research on principles and values and the measurement of ideology.
References
- Abramowitz, A. (2010). Transformation and polarization: The 2008 presidential election and the new American electorate. Electoral Studies, 29, 594–603.
- Abramowitz, A., & Saunders, K. (2008). Is polarization really a myth? Journal of Politics, 70, 542–555.
- Achen, C. H. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review, 69, 1218–1231.
- Alvarez, R. M., & Brehm, J. (1997). Are Americans ambivalent towards racial policies. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 345–374.
- Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., & Snyder, J. M. Jr. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 215–232.
- Bishop, G. F. (2005). The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American public opinion polls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W. (2012a). Political ideology in American politics: One, two, or none? The Forum, 10(3), 1–18.
- Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M. J., & Wagner, M. W. (2012b). Who fits the left–right divide?: Partisan polarization in the American electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 1631–1653.
- Chong, D. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 867–899.
- Conover, P., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of the liberal–conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617–645.
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Converse, P. E. (2006). Democratic theory and electoral reality. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 297–329.
- Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2009). Symbolic ideology in the American electorate. Electoral Studies, 28(3), 388–402.
- Ellis, C., & Stimson, J. A. (2012). Ideology in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Feldman, S. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440.
- Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In D. Sears, L. Huddy & R. Jervis (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Feldman, S., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2001). The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 658–677.
- Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America ( 3 ed.). Boston, MA: Longman.
- Goren, P. (2013). On voter competence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
- Jacoby, W. G. (2006). Value choices and American public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 706–723.
- Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670.
- Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyaday, G. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91.
- Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
- Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 778–867). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
- Kinder, D. R. (2006). Belief systems today. Critical Review, 18(1–3), 197–216.
- Lane, R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. Glencoe, IL: Free Press of Glencoe.
- Layman, G. C., & Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 786–802.
-
Levendusky, M. (2009). The Partisan Sort: How Liberals became Democrats and Conservatives became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Miller, G., & Schofield, N. (2008). The transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics, 6(3), 433–450.
- Nie, N. H., Verba, S., & Petrocik, J. R. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Saucier, G. (2000). Isms and the structure of social attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 366–385.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press.
-
Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511818691 Google Scholar
Further Reading
- Abramowitz, A. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Paul, G. (2005). Party identification and core political values. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 881–96.
- Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
- Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55–64.
Browse other articles of this reference work:
