Four Psychological Perspectives on Creativity
Development
Skills and Talent Development
Rodica Ioana Damian,
Dean Keith Simonton,
Rodica Ioana Damian
University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorDean Keith Simonton
University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorRodica Ioana Damian,
Dean Keith Simonton,
Rodica Ioana Damian
University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorDean Keith Simonton
University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Creativity is a unique feature of human thinking and behavior that is essential to our species' survival, future progress, and even the rise and fall of civilizations. To understand this highly complex phenomenon, we need to adopt an interdisciplinary and multimethod approach. Because creativity happens at many different levels both intra- and interindividual, the psychological science of creativity currently lacks a strong paradigmatic coherence. In this essay, we review creativity research from four different scientific perspectives: cognitive, differential, developmental, and social, and attempt to provide a unified overarching picture. We present foundational and cutting-edge research addressing the following questions: (i) What cognitive processes are involved in creative thinking; (ii) What personality traits are characteristic of the creative person; (iii) What developmental factors lead to creative achievement; and (iv) What social factors foster creativity? We identify current debate issues and propose ways to promote unity and coherence in creativity research across psychological subfields. We offer a clear definition of creativity and identify promising theoretical models that could help integrate and direct future research.
References
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Amabile, T., & Kramer, S. (2011). The progress principle: Using small wins to ignite joy, engagement, and creativity at work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
- Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779–806.
- Carson, S. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 198–221). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Damian, R. I., & Robins, R. W. (2012). The link between dispositional pride and creative thinking depends on current mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 765–769.
- Damian, R. I., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Aristotle's virtue or Dante's deadliest sin? The pride-creativity link and the mediating role of motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 156–160.
- Damian, R. I., & Sherman, J. W. (2013). A process dissociation examination of cognitive processes underlying unconscious thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 228–237.
-
Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2014). Psychopathology, adversity, and creativity: Diversifying experiences in the development of eminent African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, doi:10.1037/pspi0000011
10.1037/pspi0000011 Google Scholar
- Damian, R. I., & Simonton, D. K. (2011). From past to future art: The creative impact of Picasso's 1935 Minotauromachy on his 1937 Guernica. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 360–369.
- Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848.
- Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.
- Galinsky, A., Gruenfeld, D., Magee, J., Whitson, J., & Liljenquist, K. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.
- Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.
- Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–13.
- Kell, H. J., & Lubinski, D. (2014). The study of mathematically precocious youth at maturity: Insights into elements of genius. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 397–421). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Leung, A., & Chiu, C. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and openness to experience on creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 376–382.
- Leung, A. K., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169–181.
-
McCrae, R. R., & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. In D. K. Simonton (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781118367377.ch12 Google Scholar
-
Nemeth, C. J., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63–84). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0004 Google Scholar
- Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R., Strick, M., Derks, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964.
- Roskes, M., de Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. (2012). Necessity is the mother of invention: Avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 242–256.
- Runco, M., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.
- Saad, C. S., Damian, R. I., Benet-Martinez, V., Moons, W. G., & Robins, R. W. (2013). Multiculturalism and creativity: Effects of cultural context, bicultural identity, and cognitive fluency. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 369–375. doi:10.1177/1948550612456560
- Sawyer, R. K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137–154.
- Simonton, D. K. (1997). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104, 66–89.
-
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304–328). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147308.003.0014 Google Scholar
-
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139165358 Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creativity: Specialized expertise or general cognitive processes?. In M. J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 351–367). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
- Simonton, D. K. (2008). Bilingualism and creativity. In J. Altarriba & R. R. Heredia (Eds.), An introduction to bilingualism: Principles and processes (pp. 147–166). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Simonton, D. K. (2011). Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell's (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Review of General Psychology, 15, 158–174.
-
Simonton, D. K. (2012a). Creative productivity and aging: An age decrement – or not?. In S. K. Whitbourne & M. Sliwinski (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of adult development and aging (pp. 477–496). New York, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.1002/9781118392966.ch24 Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (2012b). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.
-
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creative thought as blind variation and selective retention: Why sightedness is inversely related to creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 33, 253–266.
10.1037/a0030705 Google Scholar
- Simonton, D. K. (2014). More method in the mad-genius controversy: A historiometric study of 204 historic creators. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 53–61.
-
Simonton, D. K., & Damian, R. I. (2013). Creativity. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 795–807). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376746.013.0050 Google Scholar
- Stroebe, W. (2010). The graying of academia: Will it reduce scientific productivity? American Psychologist, 65, 660–673.
- Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010). Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 157–203.
- Vohs, K. D., Redden, J. P., & Rahinel, R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, and conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological science, 24(9), 1860–1867.
Further Reading
- Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.
- J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.) (2009). Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Sawyer, R. K. (2011). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work:
