Elites
Johan S. G. Chu
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMark S. Mizruchi
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJohan S. G. Chu
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMark S. Mizruchi
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
By definition, individual elite actors have a disproportionately high level of resources at their disposal with which to influence society. The question is whether such elites are able to act in a unified and effective manner. During the twentieth century, scholars discovered mechanisms that led to elite cohesion and unified political action. In the early twenty-first century, these mechanisms have ceased to function. Elite researchers are thus faced with the challenge of identifying alternative mechanisms capable of fostering elite influence. In addition to cohesion, mechanisms of elite institutional influence and durable dominance are promising areas for study. Against the current backdrop of popular interest in elites and the many theoretical avenues opened up by researchers doing related work in fields such as economics, organizational theory, business, and psychology, the twenty-first century promises to be an important period for elite scholarship.
References
- Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26, 74–99.
- Berle, A., & Means, G. C. ([1932] 1968). The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Beyer, J., & Hoppner, M. (2003). The disintegration of organised capitalism: German corporate governance in the 1990s. West European Politics, 26(4), 179–198.
- Block, F. (1977). The ruling class does not rule: Notes on the Marxist theory of the state. Socialist Revolution, 33(7), 6–28.
- Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Chu, J. S. G., & Davis, G. F. (2013). Who killed the inner circle? The collapse of the American corporate interlock network. Working paper available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2061113. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2061113
- David, T., Ginalski, S., Rebmann, F., & Schnyder, G. (2009). The Swiss business elite between 1980–2000: Declining cohesion, changing educational profile and growing internationalization. In C. Boyer & F. Sattler (Eds.), European economic elites: Between a new spirit of capitalism and the erosion of state socialism (pp. 197–220). Berlin, Germany: Duncker & Humblot.
- Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance reshaped America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Davis, G. F., & Mizruchi, M. S. (1999). The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 215–239.
- DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90(6), 1231–1261.
- Domhoff, G. W. (1967). Who rules America? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Domhoff, G. W. (1970). The higher circles. New York, NY: Vintage.
- Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The industrial state. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
-
Heemskerk, E. M. (2007). Decline of the corporate community: Network dynamics of the Dutch business elite. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
10.5117/9789053569733 Google Scholar
- Himmelstein, J. L. (1990). To the right: The transformation of American conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Hunter, F. (1953). Community power structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
- Khan, S. R. (2012). The sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 361–377.
-
Khan, S. R. (2011). Privilege: The making of an adolescent elite at St. Paul's school. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400836222 Google Scholar
- Kopczuk, W., Saez, E., & Song, J. (2010). Earnings inequality and mobility in the United States: Evidence from Social Security data since 1937. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 91–128.
-
Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226922591.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, S. Sahlin-Andersson & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170–197). London, England: Sage.
-
Levine, L. W. (1988). Highbrow/lowbrow: The emergence of cultural hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674040137 Google Scholar
- Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social basis of modern politics. New York, NY: Doubleday.
- Lipset, S. M. (1962). Introduction. In R. Michels (Ed.), Political parties (pp. 15–39). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
- Michels, R. ([1911] 1962). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. New York, NY: Basic.
- Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1992). The structure of corporate political action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Mizruchi, M. S. (2013). The fracturing of the American corporate elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674075368 Google Scholar
- Mosca, G. ([1896] 1939). The ruling class: Elementi di scienza politica. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Pareto, V. ([1916] 1935). The mind and society [Trattato di sociologia generale]. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.
- Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.
- Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2003). Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1–39.
- Poulantzas, N. (1972). The problem of the capitalist state. In R. Blackburn (Ed.), Ideology in social science (pp. 238–253). London, England: Fontana.
- Rider, C. I., & Tan, D. (2014). Labor market advantages of organizational status: A study of lateral partner hiring by large US law firms. Organization Science. Published online in Articles in Advance 28 April 2014.
- Rivera, L. A. (2012). Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review, 77(6), 999–1022.
- Rosette, A. S., & Tost, L. P. (2013). Perceiving one's own privilege: When experiencing disadvantage on one dimension of social hierarchy motivates the perception of privilege on another. Psychological Science, 24, 1420–1427.
- Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
-
Teles, S. M. (2008). The rise of the conservative legal movement: The battle for control of the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400829699 Google Scholar
- Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Useem, M., & Karabel, J. (1986). Pathways to top corporate management. American Sociological Review, 51, 184–200.
- Zweigenhaft, R. L., & Domhoff, G. W. (2006). Diversity in the power elite. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work: