Epidemiology and Biology of Small Renal Masses
Steven C. Campbell
Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSteven C. Campbell
Glickman Urologic and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Search for more papers by this authorManoj Monga MD, FACS
Director
Stevan B. Streem Center for Endourology and Stone Disease, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, OH, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbhay Rane MS, FRCS(Urol)
Professor of Urology
East Surrey Hospital, Redhill, UK
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
The tumor biology of small renal masses represents a spectrum that includes extremes such as benign histologies and potentially aggressive renal cell carcinoma, with many indolent tumors occupying the space in between. A wide variety of treatment options is now available, ranging from active surveillance to surgical excision. Renal mass sampling has great potential to provide improved risk stratification in the future, particularly when combined with molecular profiling. Treatment should be individualized based on tumor biology, renal functional considerations, the efficacy and potential morbidity of each treatment modality, and patient comorbidities and preferences. While partial nephrectomy remains the standard of care in appropriate patients, an emerging and important role for thermal ablation has been established in the treatment of small renal masses. Further studies evaluating thermal ablation will be needed to define the optimal indications and true oncological efficacy of this modality.
References
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10–29.
- Hock LM, Lynch J, Balaji KC. Increasing incidence of all stages of kidney cancer in the last 2 decades in the United States: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology and end results program data. J Urol 2002; 167: 57–60.
- Linehan JA, Nguyen MM. Kidney cancer: the new landscape. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 133–7.
- Sun M, Abdollah F, Bianchi M, et al. Treatment management of small renal masses in the 21st century: a paradigm shift. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 2380–7.
- Berger DA, Megwalu, II, Vlahiotis A, et al. Impact of comorbidity on overall survival in patients surgically treated for renal cell carcinoma. Urology 2008; 72: 359–63.
- Miller DC, Ruterbusch J, Colt JS, et al. Contemporary clinical epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: insight from a population based case-control study. J Urol 2010; 184: 2254–8.
- Canter D, Kutikov A, Sirohi M, et al. Prevalence of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients presenting with solid renal tumors. Urology 2011; 77: 781–5.
- Clark MA, Shikanov S, Raman JD, et al. Chronic kidney disease before and after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011; 185: 43–8.
- Lane BR, Babineau D, Kattan MW, et al. A preoperative prognostic nomogram for solid enhancing renal tumors 7 cm or less amenable to partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2007; 178: 429–34.
- Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, et al. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003; 170: 2217–20.
- Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Crepel M, et al. Prognostic variables to predict cancer-related death in incidental renal tumours. BJU Int 2008; 102: 1376–80.
- Thompson RH, Kurta JM, Kaag M, et al. Tumor size is associated with malignant potential in renal cell carcinoma cases. J Urol 2009; 181: 2033–6.
- Rothman J, Egleston B, Wong YN, et al. Histopathological characteristics of localized renal cell carcinoma correlate with tumor size: a SEER analysis. J Urol 2009; 181: 29–33.
- Jewett MA, Mattar K, Basiuk J, et al. Active surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 39–44.
- Rosales JC, Haramis G, Moreno J, et al. Active surveillance for renal cortical neoplasms. J Urol 2010; 183: 1698–702.
- Kunkle DA, Crispen PL, Chen DY, et al. Enhancing renal masses with zero net growth during active surveillance. J Urol 2007; 177: 849–53.
- Crispen PL, Viterbo R, Boorjian SA, et al. Natural history, growth kinetics, and outcomes of untreated clinically localized renal tumors under active surveillance. Cancer 2009; 115: 2844–52.
- Smaldone MC, Kutikov A, Egleston BL, et al. Small renal masses progressing to metastases under active surveillance: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Cancer 2011; 118: 997–1006.
- Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1331–4.
- Samplaski MK, Zhou M, Lane BR, Herts B, Campbell SC. Renal mass sampling: an enlightened perspective. Int J Urol 2011; 18: 5–19.
- Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 578–84.
- Lane BR, Samplaski MK, Herts BR, et al. Renal mass biopsy – a renaissance? J Urol 2008; 179: 20–7.
- Barwari K, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP. The penetration of renal mass biopsy in daily practice: a survey among urologists. J Endourol 2012; 26: 737–47.
- Blumenfeld AJ, Guru K, Fuchs GJ, Kim HL. Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade. Urology 2010; 76: 610–13.
- Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Memarsadeghi M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Urol 2008; 53: 1003–11.
- Wang R, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr, Higgins EJ, Hafez KS. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009; 73: 586–90.
- Yamaguchi Y, Simmons MN, Campbell SC. Small renal masses: risk prediction and contemporary management. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2011; 25: 717–36.
- Tan HJ, Jacobs BL, Hafez KS, et al. Understanding the role of percutaneous biopsy in the management of patients with a small renal mass. Urology 2012; 79: 372–7.
- Veltri A, Garetto I, Tosetti I, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of imaging-guided needle biopsy of renal masses. Retrospective analysis on 150 cases. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 393–401.
- Breau RH, Crispen PL, Jenkins SM, Blute ML, Leibovich BC. Treatment of patients with small renal masses: a survey of the American Urological Association. J Urol 2011; 185: 407–13.
- Miller DC, Schonlau M, Litwin MS, Lai J, Saigal CS. Renal and cardiovascular morbidity after partial or radical nephrectomy. Cancer 2008; 112: 511–20.
- Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 179: 468–71.
- Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 1236–42.
- Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 735–40.
- Stern JM, Gupta A, Raman JD, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of small renal cortical tumours in healthy adults: renal function preservation and intermediate oncological outcome. BJU Int 2009; 104: 786–9.
- Mues AC, Landman J. Results of kidney tumor cryoablation: renal function preservation and oncologic efficacy. World J Urol 2010; 28: 565–70.
- Van Poppel H, da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 543–52.
- Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 2001; 166: 6–18.
- Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182: 1271–9.
- Volpe A, Cadeddu JA, Cestari A, et al. Contemporary management of small renal masses. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 501–15.
- Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma – a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008; 179: 1227–33.
- Kang DC, Palmer DA, Zarei M, et al. A systemic review of the quality of evidence for ablative therapy of small renal masses. J Urol 2012; 187: 44–7.
- Nguyen CT, Campbell SC. Salvage of local recurrence after primary thermal ablation for small renal masses. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008; 8: 1899–905.
- Mason RJ, Abdolell M, Trottier G, et al. Growth kinetics of renal masses: analysis of a prospective cohort of patients undergoing active surveillance. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 863–7.
- Siu W, Hafez KS, Johnston WK, 3rd, Wolf JS Jr. Growth rates of renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma under surveillance are similar. Urol Oncol 2007; 25: 115–19.
- Abouassaly R, Lane BR, Novick AC. Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients. J Urol 2008; 180: 505–8.