Assessing Responses to Literature
Abstract
This chapter examines research on issues of validity and reliability in assessment of students’ literary responses associated with their experiential transaction with a literary text. It describes the uses of summative assessment of learning literary responses as well as formative assessment for fostering learning of literary responses. It posits that effective summative assessment of literary responses involves open-ended writing tasks or uses of student-generated portfolios based on students’ written responses over time in lieu of multiple choice items, while at the same time taking into account the influence of differences in language proficiency, requiring development of prompts and tasks designed to accommodate for variations in language proficiency. It posits that effective formative assessment of oral literary responses involves facilitation of classroom or online discussions whereby students can generate ample responses for teachers to assess based on shared criteria or rubrics that can also be used to foster students’ self-assessing of their discussion responses. And, to provide effective formative assessment of students’ written literary responses, it recommends creating engaging, open-ended writing assignments with clearly specified criteria for defining effective interpretations so that teachers can provide descriptive feedback through individual conferences, written comments, or audio recordings to foster student self-assessing and revision of their writing, as well as training peers to provide feedback.
References
- Anagnostopoulos, D. (2003). Testing and student engagement with literature in urban classrooms: A multi-layered perspective. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 177–212.
- Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730.
- Beach, R., Appleman, D., Hynds, S., & Wilhelm, J. (2011). Teaching literature to adolescents. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Beach, R., Eddleston, S., & Philippot, R. (2004). Enhancing large-group literature discussions. In B. Hout, B. Stroble, & C. Bazerman (Eds.), Multiple literacies for the 21st century: Proceedings of the 1998 Watson conference (pp. 129–40). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Beach, R., & Friedrich, T. (2006). Response to writing. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 222–34). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Bernhardt, E. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 133–50.
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
- Bowers-Campbell, J. (2011). Take it out of class: Exploring virtual literature circles. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(8), 557–67.
-
Burgin, J., &
Hughes, G. D.
(2009).
Credibly assessing reading and writing abilities for both elementary students and program assessment.
Assessing Writing, 14(1), 25–37.
10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.001 Google Scholar
- Ferris, D. R., Brown, J., Liu, H. S., & Stine, M. E. A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207–34.
- Galda, L., & Beach, R. (2001). Theory and research into practice: Response to literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 64–73.
- Goodwyn, A. (2010). The status of literature in a national curriculum: A case study of England. English in Australia, 45(1), 18–29.
- Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2011). Throw 'em out or make 'em better? State and district high-stakes writing assessments. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44(1), 1–12.
- Harrison, C. (2004). Postmodern principles for responsive reading assessment. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(2), 163–73.
- Hillocks, G. (1980). Toward a hierarchy of skills in the comprehension of literature. English Journal, 69(7), 54–9.
- Hout, M., & Elliott, S. W. (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington, DC: Board on Testing and Assessment, The National Academies.
- Janssen, T., Braaksma, M., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006). Literary reading activities of good and weak students: A think aloud study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(1), 35–52.
- Lee, C. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Lewis, W. E., & Ferretti, R. P. (2011). Topoi and literary interpretation: The effects of a critical reading and writing intervention on high school students’ analytic literary essays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 334–54.
-
Llosa, L.,
Beck, S. W., &
Zhao, C. G.
(2011).
An investigation of academic writing in secondary schools to inform the development of diagnostic classroom assessments.
Assessing Writing, 16, 256–73.
10.1016/j.asw.2011.07.001 Google Scholar
- Love, K. (2006). Appraisal in online discussions of literary texts. Text & Talk, 26(2), 217–44.
-
Macken-Horarik, M., &
Morgan, W.
(2011).
Towards a metalanguage adequate to linguistic achievement in post-structuralism and English: Reflections on voicing in the writing of secondary students.
Linguistics and Education, 22(2), 133–49.
10.1016/j.linged.2010.11.003 Google Scholar
- Marshall, B. (2011). Testing English: Formative and summative approaches to English assessment. New York, NY: Continuum.
- Menken, K. (2010). NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequences. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 121–8.
- Myers, J., & Eberfors, F. (2010). Globalizing English through intercultural critical literacy. English Education, 42(2), 148–70.
- National Center for Education Statistics (2011). The nation's report card: Reading 2011. Accessed November 20, 2012 from http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2011
- National Governors’ Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Retrieved November 20, 2012 from http://www.corestandards.org/
- Olson, C. B., Land, R., Anselmi, T., & AuBuchon, C. (2010). Teaching secondary English learners to understand, analyze, and write interpretive essays about theme. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(4), 245–56.
-
Rezaei, A. R., &
Lovorn, M.
(2010).
Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing.
Assessing Writing, 51(1), 18–39.
10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003 Google Scholar
- Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as exploration ( 5th ed.). New York, NY: MLA.
- Ruzich, C., & Canan, J. (2010). Computers, coffee shops, and classrooms: Promoting partnerships and fostering authentic discussion. English Journal, 99(5), 61–6.
-
Urlaub, P.
(2011).
Developing literary reading skills through creative writing in German as a second language.
Unterrichtspraxis, 44(2), 98–105.
10.1111/j.1756-1221.2011.00099.x Google Scholar
Suggested Readings
- J. H. Anderson, & C. R. Farris (Eds.). (2007). Integrating literature and writing instruction. New York, NY: MLA.
- Applegate, A. J., Applegate, M. D., McGeehan, C. M., Pinto, C. M., & Kong, A. (2009). The assessment of thoughtful literacy in NAEP: Why the states aren't measuring up. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 372–81.
- Beach, R., Haertling-Thein, A., & Parks, D. (2008). High school students’ competing social worlds: Negotiating identities and allegiances in response to multicultural literature. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
Crusan, D.
(2010).
Assessment in the second language writing classroom.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
10.3998/mpub.770334 Google Scholar
- Rosario M. Basterra, E. Trumbull, & G. Solano-Flores (Eds.). (2011). Cultural validity in assessment: Addressing linguistic and cultural diversity. New York, NY: Routledge.
- B. Hout, & P. O'Neill (Eds.). (2008). Assessing writing: A critical sourcebook. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Johannessen, L. R., Kahn, E. A., & Walter, C. C. (2009). Writing about literature ( 2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
- Juzwik, M. M., Nystrand, M., Kelly, S., & Sherry, M. B. (2008). Oral narrative genres as dialogic resources for classroom literature study: A contextualized case study of conversational narrative discussion. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1111–54.
- Langer, J. (2010). Envisioning literature: Literary understanding and literature instruction. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- N. A. Mahir, & N. S. M. Saad (Eds.). (2010). Essays on ESL reading and writing. Negri Sembilan: USIM's Publisher, Islamic Science University of Malaysia.
- Neal, M. R. (2010). Writing assessment and revolution in digital texts and technologies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Peskin, J. (2010). The development of poetic literacy during the school years. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(2), 77–103.
- Rajaram, D. V. (2010). Multiple literary interpretations: Empowering learners through literary theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
-
Soter, A. O.,
Wilkinson, I. A.,
Murphy, P. K.,
Rudge, L.,
Reninger, K., &
Edwards, M.
(2008).
What the discourse tells us: Talk and indicators of high-level comprehension.
International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 372–91.
10.1016/j.ijer.2009.01.001 Google Scholar
- S. Swaffield (Ed.). (2008). Unlocking assessment: Understanding for reflection and application. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Yancey, K. B. (2004). Teaching literature as reflective practice. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
-
Zainal, A.
(2012).
Validation of an ESL writing test in a Malaysian secondary school context.
Assessing Writing, 17, 1–17.
10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.002 Google Scholar
Online Resources
- Beach, R., Appleman, D., Hynds, S., & Wilhelm, J. (2011). Teaching literature to adolescents: Companion Web site. Retrieved November 20, 2012 from http://teachingliterature.pbworks.com
- Beach, R., Haertling-Thein, A., & Webb, A. (2012). Teaching to exceed the English language arts Common Core State Standards: A literacy practices approach for 6–12 classrooms. Retrieved November 20, 2012 from http://tinyurl.com/cedetm5