Existential Sentences and Expletive There
Andrea Moro,
Andrea Moro
Institute for Advanced Studies of Pavia, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAndrea Moro,
Andrea Moro
Institute for Advanced Studies of Pavia, Center for Neurocognition, Epistemology and Theoretical Syntax, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
One of the basic premises of the theory of syntax is that clause structures can be minimally identified as containing a verb phrase that plays the role of predicate and a noun phrase that plays the role of subject. Copular sentences – that is, sentences that contain the verb to be or its (verbal) equivalent across languages – depart from this pattern: they provide a special case study where the noun phrase that co-occurs with the verb phrase plays the role of predicate. This anomaly reveals crucial and otherwise hidden properties of the clause structure. This chapter deals with the empirical identification of two symmetrical varieties of copular sentences – namely canonical versus inverse sentences – and along with it explores many peculiar properties, such as binding theoretical effects, backward reflexivisation, pseudo-extraction, the predicative role of pro, and the dramatic role of these sentences in triggering the pro-drop parameter.
References
- Abbott, Barbara. 1992. “ Definiteness, Existentials, and the ‘List’ Interpretation.” In Proceedings of SALT 2, edited by Baker Chris and David Dowty, 1–16.
- Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 4: 159–219.
- Belletti, Adriana. 1999. “ Inversion as Focalization.” In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, edited by Aafke Hulke and Jean-Yves Pollock, 60–90. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Benveniste, Émile. 1966. “ Être et avoir dans leurs fonctions linguistiques.” In Émile Benveniste, Problèmes de linguistique générale, 187–207. Paris: Gallimard.
- Berwick, Robert. 1982. “ Locality Principles and the Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge.” PhD diss., MIT.
-
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.
10.1515/9783110808506 Google Scholar
- Bowers, John. 1993. “The Syntax of Predication.” Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 591–656.
-
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7 Google Scholar
- Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ian Roberts. 1990. “ Levels of Representation of Agreement.” Paper presented at the Thirteenth GLOW Conference, St John's College, Cambridge.
-
Carlson, Gregory N.
1977. “A Unified Analysis of English Bare Plural.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 1: 413–457.
10.1007/BF00353456 Google Scholar
- Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. “ Syntactic Bootstrapping and the Acquisition of Noun Meanings: The Mass–Count Issue.” In Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition, edited by Lust Barbara, Hermon Gabriella, and Kornfilt Jaklin, 1: 301–318. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
- Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConell-Ginet. 2001. Meaning and Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1973. “ Conditions on Transformations.” In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, edited by Anderson Stephen and Kiparsky Paul, 232–286. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on Form and Interpretation. New York, NY: North-Holland.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York, NY: Praeger.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1991. “ Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation.” In Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, edited by Robert Freidin, 417–454. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “ A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2013a. “ Poverty of the Stimulus: Willingness to be Puzzled.” In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, edited by M. Piattelli-Palmarini and R. Berwick, 61–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 2013b. “Problems of Projection”, Lingua, 18: 1–35.
- Cinque, Guglielmo. 1979. “ Left Dislocation: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Analysis.” MS, CLESP, Padua.
- Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A′-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Delfitto, Denis. 2002. Genericity in Language. Alessandria: Edizioni Dell'Orso.
- Dikken, Marcel den. 2003. The Structure of the Noun Phrase in Rotuman. Munich: LINCOM Europa Academic Publishers.
-
Graffi, Giorgio. 2001. 200 Years of Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/sihols.98 Google Scholar
-
Hale, Ken, and Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomena to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hartmann, Jutta M. 2011. “Predicate Inversion and English There-Sentences.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 58 (3): 221–240.
- Higginbotham, James. 1987. “ Indefiniteness and Predication.” In The Representation of (In)Definiteness, edited by Eric Reuland and Alice Meulen, 43–70. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Hyams, Nina. 1986. Language Acquisition and the Theory of Parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
10.1007/978-94-009-4638-5 Google Scholar
-
Jenkins, Lyle. 1975. The English Existential. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
10.1515/9783111357188 Google Scholar
- Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
- Kant, Immanuel. 1965. Critique of Pure Reason. New York, NY: St Martin's.
- Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
Kayne, Richard. 2008. “ Expletives, Datives and the Tension between Morphology and Syntax.” In The Limits of Syntactic Variation, edited by Teresa Biberauer, 175–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/la.132.07kay Google Scholar
- Kayne, Richard. 2011. “ Why Are There No Directionality Parameters?” Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1–23.
- Koopman, Hilda. 2002. “ Inside the ‘Noun’ in Maasai.” MS, UCLA, Los Angeles.
- Lasnik, Howard. 1995. “Case and Expletives Revisited: On Greed and Other Human Failings.” Linguistic Inquiry, 26: 615–633.
- Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1999. “ Different Types of Inverted Subjects.” MS, University of Trieste.
- Lumsden, Michael. 1988. Existential Sentences: Their Structure and Meaning. London: Croom Helm.
- Manzini, Maria Rita, and Kenneth Wexler. 1987. “Parameters, Binding Theory, and Learnability.” Linguistic Inquiry, 18: 413–444.
- Marantz, Alec. 1995. “ A Reader's Guide to a Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In The Principles and Parameters Approach to Syntactic Theory: A Synopsis, edited by Gert Webelhuth, 349–82. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Milsark, Gary. 1974. “ Existential Sentences in English.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Milsark, Gary. 1977. “Towards an Explanation of Certain Peculiarities in the Existential Construction in English.” Linguistic Analysis, 3: 1–30.
- Moro, Andrea. 1987. “ Tempo e predicazione nella sintassi delle frasi copulari.” PhD diss., University of Pavia.
- Moro, Andrea. 1988. “Per una teoria unificata delle frasi copulari.” Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 13: 81–110.
- Moro, Andrea. 1991. “The Raising of Predicates.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 15: 193–218.
- Moro, Andrea. 1993a. “ A Case Study in Linguistic Variation: The Semantics of Existential Sentences.” In Proceedings of the XVII Meeting of Generative Grammar, edited by Fava Elisabetta, 265–287.
- Moro, Andrea. 1993b. “Heads as Antecedents: A Brief History of the ECP.” Lingua e Stile, 28: 31–57.
-
Moro, Andrea. 1997. The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511519956 Google Scholar
- Moro, Andrea. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moro, Andrea. 2009. “ Rethinking Symmetry: A Note on Labelling and the EPP.” In La grammatica tra storia e teoria: Scritti in onore di Giorgio Graffi, edited by P. Cotticelli Kurras and A. Tomaselli, 129–31. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso. (Also at http://www.ledonline.it/snippets/allegati/snippets19007.pdf.)
- Moro, Andrea. 2013. The Equilibrium of Human Syntax: Symmetries in the Brain. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Poletto, Cecilia. 1993. La sintassi del soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. Padua: Unipress.
- Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
- Reuland, Eric, and Alice ter Meulen. 1987. The Representation of (In)Definiteness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Richards, Marc, and Teresa Biberauer. 2005. “ Explaining Expl.” In The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories, edited by Marcel Dikken. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “ The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Rothstein, Susan. 1983. “ The Syntactic Forms of Predication.” PhD diss., Cambridge, MA, MIT.
- Safir, Kenneth. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Stowell, Tim. 1978. “ What Was There before There Was There.” In Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by Farkas Donka, Wesley M. Jacobsen, and Karol W. Todrys, 475–471. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
- Williams, Edwin. 1984. “ There-Insertion.” Linguistic Inquiry, 15: 131–153.
- Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 1991. “ Expletive Raising and Expletive Replacement in Dutch.” In Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1991, edited by Westphal German, Ao Benjamin, and Chae Hee-Rahk, 393–404.
Further reading
- Ileana Comorovski, and Klaus Heusinger, eds. 2008. Existence: Semantics and Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
Citing Literature
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition
Browse other articles of this reference work:
