Condition C Violations and Strong Crossover
Abstract
This chapter provides historical overview of Condition C and strong crossover (SCO). These conceptions grew out of investigations into studies of conditions on backward pronominalization in English. Central to many of these investigations were developing notions of command (Ross 1967a; Langacker 1969; Culicover 1976; Lasnik 1976). The core idea of the Condition C account of SCO had been developed by Wasow (1972), who proposed reducing SCO to a condition on backward pronominalization. Wasow was revising and refining the account of Postal (1971), who first discussed crossover without distinguishing the weak and strong varieties. Alternative approaches to SCO were subsequently developed, as were attempts to extend the Condition C account to related domains. Some important problems for the Condition C account were raised by Higginbotham (1980; 1983) and Cable (2008).
References
- Barss, Andrew. 1986. “ Chains and Anaphoric Dependence: On Reconstruction and its Implications.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Cable, Seth. 2008. “ Some Background on Principle C.” Class handout, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Accessed October 2, 2016. http://people.umass.edu/scable/PNWSeminar/handouts/PrinC/
- Chomsky, Noam. 1955. “ The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory.” MS, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, and MIT, Cambridge, MA [revised 1956 version published in part by Plenum, New York, 1975; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1985].
- Chomsky, Noam. 1976. “Conditions on Rules of Grammar.” Linguistic Analysis, 2: 303–351.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1980. “On Binding.” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “ A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In The View from Building 20, edited by Ken Hale and Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. “ Principles and Parameter Theory.” In Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, edited by Arnim Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann, 506–569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Culicover, Peter. 1976. “A Constraint on Coreferentiality.” Foundations of Language, 14: 109–118.
- Culicover, Peter. 1997. Principles and Parameters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Engdahl, Elisabet. 1986. Constituent Questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.
- Epstein, Samuel David. 1984. “A Note on Functional Determination and Strong Crossover.” Linguistic Review 3: 299–284.
- Freidin, Robert, and Howard Lasnik. 1981. “Disjoint Reference and wh-Trace.” Linguistic Inquiry, 12: 39–53.
- Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Tanya Reinhart. 1993. “The Innateness of Binding and Coreference.” Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 69–101.
- Harris, Zellig. 1957. “Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure.” Language, 33: 283–340.
- Heim, Irene. 1998. “ Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation: A Reinterpretation of Reinhart's Approach.” In The Interpretive Tract, edited by Uli Sauerland and Orin Percus, 205–246. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
- Higginbotham, James. 1980. “Pronouns and Bound Variables.” Linguistic Inquiry, 11: 679–708.
- Higginbotham, James. 1983. “Logical Form, Binding, and Nominals.” Linguistic Inquiry, 14: 395–420.
- Jacobson, Pauline. 1976. “ Crossover and Some Related Problems.” Master's thesis, University of California, Berkeley,
- Jacobson, Pauline. 1977. “ The Syntax of Crossing Coreference Sentences.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
- Klima, Edward S. 1964. “ Negation in English.” In The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language, edited by Jerry A. Fodor and Jerrold J. Katz, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1983. “Variables and the Bijection Principle.” Linguistic Review, 2: 139–160.
-
Koster, Jan. 1987. Domains and Dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.
10.1515/9783110808520 Google Scholar
- Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, George. 1968. “ Pronouns and Reference.” Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, distributed by Indiana University of Linguistics Club [reprinted in Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7: Notes from the Linguistic Underground, edited by James D. McCawley, 275–335. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1976].
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. “ On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command.” In Modern Studies in English, edited by David A. Reibel and Sandford A. Schane, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Lasnik, Howard. 1976. “Remarks on Coreference.” Linguistic Analysis, 2: 1–22 [reprinted in Lasnik (1989)].
-
Lasnik, Howard. 1989. Essays on Anaphora. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
10.1007/978-94-009-2542-7 Google Scholar
- Lasnik, Howard, and Juan Uriagereka. 1988. A Course in GB Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.
- Lees, Robert, and Edward Klima. 1963. “The Grammar of English Nominalizations.” Language, 36: 17–29.
- May, Robert. 1979. “Must COMP-to-COMP Movement be Stipulated?” Linguistic Inquiry, 10: 719–725.
- Postal, Paul. 1966. “ On So-Called ‘Pronouns’ in English.” In 19th Monograph on Language and Linguistics, edited by F. Dineen, 177–206. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Postal, Paul. 1971. Cross-Over Phenomena. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Postal, Paul M. 2004. Skeptical Linguistic Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Reinhart, Tanya. 1976. “ The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Reinhart, Tanya. 1983a. Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Reinhart, Tanya. 1983b. “Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 6: 47–88.
-
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/3846.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland. 1993. “Reflexivity.” Linguistic Inquiry, 24: 657–720.
- Riemsdijk, Henk van. 1982. “ Derivational Grammar vs. Representational Grammar.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL – 1981, 211–231.
-
Riemsdijk, Henk van, and Edwin Williams. 1981. “NP-Structure.” Linguistic Review, 1: 171–217.
10.1515/tlir.1981.1.2.171 Google Scholar
- Riemsdijk, Henk van, and Edwin Williams. 1986. Introduction to the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ross, John. 1967a. “ Constraints on Variables in Syntax.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Ross, John. 1967b. “ On the Cyclic Nature of English Pronominalization.” In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 11 October 1966, 1699–1682. The Hague: Mouton.
- Safir, Ken. 1996. “Derivation, Representation, and the Resumption: The Domain of Weak Crossover.” Linguistic Inquiry, 27: 313–339.
- Safir, Ken. 1999. “Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in A′-Chains.” Linguistic Inquiry, 30: 587–620.
- Sportiche, Dominique. 1983. “ Structural Invariance and Symmetry in Syntax.” PhD diss., MIT.
- Wasow, Thomas. 1972. “ Anaphoric Relations in English.” PhD diss., MIT.
Citing Literature
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition
Browse other articles of this reference work: