Ionizing Radiation, Biological Effects of
Colin J. Martin
Health Physics, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
Search for more papers by this authorColin J. Martin
Health Physics, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Ionizing radiations are x-rays, γ-rays, and small atomic particles that have sufficient energy to ionize atoms. The local deposition of energy involved can damage or kill cells. It may also produce subtle changes in a cell genetic make-up. Much has been learned about effects of radiation from experiments on cell cultures. These experiments have shown that large particle radiations are more damaging than x-rays for the amount of energy released. They have also shown that when similar doses of x-rays are delivered at lower dose rates, less damage is produced because the cells are able to effectively repair much of the damage. The effects of radiation on human populations have been assessed through epidemiological studies of groups exposed to very large doses, such as the survivors of the atomic bombs exploded over Japan. Exposure to large doses of radiation above a certain threshold produces tissue reactions in the short term. Longer-term effects may occur after exposure to low doses of radiation, which are referred to as stochastic effects, as their occurrence is governed by the laws of chance. Stochastic effects are the induction of cancer and of genetic effects. Cancer induced by radiation will not develop until many years after exposure and the risks are greater among those exposed as children. Risks have been estimated from epidemiological studies, by extrapolating dose-response data down to the low doses received by radiation workers, but debate exists about whether the current extrapolation model may be too conservative.
Bibliography
- 1E. J. Hall, Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott & Co, 2000.
- 2G. G. Steel, Basic Clinical Radiobiology, 3rd ed. London: Arnold, 2002.
- 3J. W. Stather and H. Smith, Biological effects of ionising radiation. In: C. J. Martin and D. G. Sutton, eds., Practical Radiation Protection in Healthcare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 27–42.
- 4 C. J. Martin, P. P. Dendy, and R. H. Corbett, eds., Medical Imaging and Radiation Protection for Medical Students and Clinical Staff. London: British Institute of Radiology, 2003.
- 5ICRP Publication 60. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: biological effects of ionising radiation. Ann. ICRP 1991; 21:1–3.
- 6United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, Volume II: Effects of atomic radiation. United Nations sales publication E.00.IX.4. New York: United Nations, 2000.
- 7M. Chomentowski, A. B. Kellerer, and D. A. Pierce, Radiation dose dependence in the atomic bomb survivor cancer mortality data: a model-free visualisation. Radiat. Res. 2000; 153: 289–294.
- 8A. M. Kellerer, Radiation risk – historical perspective and current issues. J. Radiol. Prot. 2002; 22: A1–A10.
- 9G. R. Howe and J. McLaughlin, Breast cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate dose-rate ionising radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort and a comparison with breast cancer mortality in the atomic bomb survivors study. Radiat. Res. 1996; 145: 694–707.
- 10H. A. Weiss, S. C. Darby, T. Fearn, and R. Doll, Leukaemia mortality after x-ray treatment for ankylosing spondilitis. Radiat. Res. 1995; 142: 1–11.
- 11E. Ron, B. Modan, D. L. Preston, E. Alfandary, M. Stovall, and J. D. Boice, Jr., Thyroid neoplasia following low dose radiation in childhood. Radiat. Res. 1989; 120: 516–531.
- 12United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 1988 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations sales publication E.88.IX.7. New York: United Nations, 1988.
- 13A. J. Van der Kogel and K. K. Aug, Complications related to radiotherapy. In: M. Peckham, H. Pinedo, and U. Veronesi, eds. Oxford Textbook of Oncology, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 2295–2306.
- 14B. Enami, J. Lyman, A. Brown, L. Cora, M. Goitein, J. E. Munzenrider, B. Shank, L. J. Solin, and M. Wesson, Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int. J. Radial Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1991; 21: 109–122.
10.1016/0360-3016(91)90171-Y Google Scholar
- 15D. Sumner, T. Wheldon, and W. Watson, Radiation Risks: An Evaluation. Glasgow: Tarragon Press, 1991.
- 16 W. R. Hendee and F. M. Edwards, eds., Health Effects of Exposure to Low Level Ionising Radiation. London: IOP Publishing, 1996.
- 17G. Olivieri, J. Bodycote, and S. Wolff, Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science 1984; 233: 594–597.
- 18L. Cai, Research of the adaptive response induced by low-dose radiation: where have we been and where should we go? Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1999; 18: 419–425.
- 19L. E. Feinendegen, Relative implications of protective responses versus damage induction at low-dose and low-dose rate exposures, using the microdose approach. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2003; 104: 337–346.
- 20L. E. Feinendegen, Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005; 78: 3–7.
- 21A. Kronenberg, Radiation-induced genomic instability. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1994; 66: 603–609.
- 22L. E. Smith, S. Nagar, G. J. Kim, and W. F. Morgan, Radiation-induced genomic instability and dose response. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 23–29.
- 23J. B. Little, Radiation sensitive tissue: cell volume, bystander effects and genomic instability. In: T. M. Fleidner, L. E. Feinendegen, and J. W. Hopewell, eds., Chronic Irradiation: Tolerance and Failure in Complex Biological Systems. Br. J. Radiol. Suppl. 2002; 26:15–18.
- 24E. J. Hall, The bystander effect. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 31–35.
- 25P. D. Dendy and M. J. P. Brugmans, Low dose radiation risks. Br. J. Radiol. 2003; 76: 674–677.
- 26S. H. Moolgavar and A. G. Knudson, Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis. J. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981; 66: 1037–1052.
- 27J. Bergonié and L. Tribondeau, De quelques resultants de la radiotherapie et essai de fixation d’une technique rationelle. C.R. Seances Acad. Sci. 1906; 43:983. (English translation G. H. Fletcher, Interpretation of some results of radiotherapy and an attempt at determining a logical treatment technique. Radiat. Res. 1959; 11:587.
- 28J. W. Hopewell, Mechanisms of action of radiation on skin and underlying tissues. Br. J. Radiol. 1986; (Suppl. 19):39–51.
- 29D. R. Wigg, Applied Radiobiology and Bio-effect Planning. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing, 2001.
- 30G. J. Kutcher and C. Burman, Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1998; 16: 1623–1630.
- 31T. B. Shope, Radiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy. Radiographics 1996; 16: 1195–1199.
- 32ICRP Publication 85, Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann. ICRP 2000; 30:2.
- 33B. M. Jones, R. G. Dale, C. Deehan, K. I. Hopkins, and D. A. L. Morgan, The role of biologically effective dose in clinical oncology. Clin. Oncol. 2001; 13: 71–81.
- 34M. Saunders and S. Dische, Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised multi-centre trial. Lancet 1997; 350: 161–165.
- 35S. Webb, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Bristol: IoP Publishing, 2001.
10.1887/0750306998 Google Scholar
- 36 P. Hoskin and C. Coyle, eds., Brachytherapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
- 37R. G. Dale and B. Jones, The clinical radiobiology of brachytherapy. Brit. J. Radiol. 1998; 71: 463–483.
10.1259/bjr.71.845.9691890 Google Scholar
- 38B. M. Jones, P. L. Pryce, P. R. Blake, and R. G. Dale, High dose rate brachytherapy practice for the treatment of gynaecological cancers in the UK. Brit. J. Radiol. 1999; 72: 371–377.
- 39 S. Nag, ed. High Dose Rate Brachytherapy: A Armonk, NY: Publishing, 1994.
- 40J.H. Lubin, J. D. Boice, Jr., C. Edling, G. R. Hornung, E. Kunz, R. A. Kusiak, H. I. Morrison, E. P. Radford, and J. M. Samet, Lung cancer risk in radon-exposed miners and estimation of risk from indoor exposure. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995; 87: 817–827.
- 41Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionising Radiation (BEIR VI). The health effects of exposure to indoor radon. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy Press, 1999.
- 42R. E. Rowland, Dose-response relationships for female radium dial workers: a new look. In: G. Kaick, A. Karaoglou, and A. M. Kellerer, eds., Health Effects of Internally Deposited Radionuclides (Emphasis on Radium and Thorium). London: World Scientific, 1995, pp. 135–141.
- 43E. G. Knox, A. M. Stewart, G. W. Kneale, and E. A. Gilman, Prenatal irradiation and childhood cancer. J. Soc. Radiol. Prot. 1987; 7: 177–189.
10.1088/0260-2814/7/4/003 Google Scholar
- 44J. F. Bitchell, Epidemiological studies of children irradiation in utero. In: K. F. Baverstock and J. W. Stather, eds., Biological Bases of Risk Assessment. London: Taylor and Francis, 1989, pp. 77–87.
- 45R. Wakeford and M. P. Little, Childhood cancer after low-level intrauterine exposure to radiation. J. Radiol. Prot. 2002; 22: A123–A127.
- 46A. Berrington, S. C. Darby, H. A. Weiss, and R. Doll, 100 years of observation on British radiologists: mortality from cancer and other causes 1897–1997. Brit. J. Radiol. 2001; 74: 507–519.
- 47E. S. Gilbert, D. L. Cragle, and L. D. Wiggs, Updated analyses of combined mortality data on workers at the Hanford site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Rocky Flats weapons plant. Radiat. Res. 1993; 136: 408–421.
- 48C. R. Muirhead, A. A. Goodill, R. G. E. Haycock, J. Vokes, M. P. Little, D. A. Jackson, J. A. O’Hagan, J. M. Thomas, G. M. Kendall, T. J. Silk, D. Bingham, and G. L. C. Berridge, Occupational radiation exposure and mortality: second analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. J. Radiol. Prot. 1999; 19: 3–26.
- 49N. A. Koshurnikova, G. D. Bysogolov, M. G. Bolotnikova, et al., Mortality among personnel who worked at the Mayak complex in the first years of its operation. Health Phys. 1996; 71: 90–93.
- 50S. Darby, D. Hill, A. Auvinen, J. M. Barros-Dios, J. M. Baysson, F. Bochicchio, H. Deo, R. Falk, F. Forsatiere, M. Hakama, I. Heid, L. Kreienbrock, M. Kreuzer, F. Lagarde, I. Makelainen, C. Muirhead, W. Oberaigner, G. Pershagen, A. Ruano-Ravina, E. Ruosteenoja, A. Schaffrath Rosario, M. Tirmarche, L. Tomasek, E. Whitley, H. E. Wickmann, and R. Doll, Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ 2005; 330: 223–228.
- 51E. Cardis, E. S. Gilbert, L. Carpenter, G. Howe, I. Kato, B. K. Armstrong, V. Beral, G. Cowper, A. Douglas, J. Fix, S. A. Fry, J. Kaldor, C. Lave, L. Salmon, P. G. Smith, G. L. Voelz, and L. D. Wiggs, Effects of low doses and low does rates of external ionising radiation: cancer mortality among nuclear industry workers in three countries. Radiat. Res. 1995; 142: 117–132.
- 52International Agency for Research on Cancer Study Group on Cancer Risk among Nuclear Industry Workers. Direct estimates of cancer mortality due to low doses of ionising radiation: an international study. Lancet 1994; 344:1039–1044.
- 53J. Wang, Statistical analysis of cancer mortality data of high background radiation areas in Yiangjiang. Chin. J. Radiol Med. Prot. 1993; 13: 291–294, 358.
- 54J. Jagger, Natural background radiation and cancer death in Rocky Mountain and Gulf Coast States. Health Phys. 1998; 75: 428–434.
- 55A. C. Upton, The state of the art in the 1990's: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose response relationship for ionising radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 15–22.
- 56United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations sales publication E.94.IX.2. New York: United Nations, 1993.
- 57D. J. Brenner and R. K. Sachs, Domestic radon risks may be dominated by bystander effect – but the risks are unlikely to be greater than we thought. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 103–108.
- 58M.P. Little, The bystander effect model of Bremner and Sachs fitted to lung cancer data of 11 cohorts of underground miners, and equivalence of fit of a linear relative risk model with adjustment for attained age and age at exposure. J. Radiol. Prot. 2004; 24: 243–255.
- 59ICRP Publication Genetic susceptibility to cancer. Ann. ICRP 1998; 28:1–2.
- 60National Radiological Protection Board. Genetic heterogeneity in the population and its implications for radiation risk. Report of an Advisory group on Ionising radiation Doc. NRPB 1999; 10(3):1–4.
- 61P. D. Inskip, Second cancers following radiotherapy. In: A. I. Neugut, A. T. Meadows, and E. Robinson, eds. Multiple Primary Cancers. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1999, pp. 91–135.
- 62E. Ron, Cancer risks from medical radiation. Health Phys. 2003; 85: 47–59.
- 63ICRP Publication 90 Biological effects of prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). Ann. ICRP 2003; 33:1–2.
- 64C. J. Martin, Radiation safety. In: Encyclopaedia of Bio-Medical Engineering. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006.
- 65C. J. Martin, D. G. Sutton, P. J. Mountford, and A. P. Hufton, Risk control in medical exposures. In: C. J. Martin and D. G. Sutton, eds., Practical Radiation Protection in Healthcare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 173–188.
- 66C. E. Land, Uncertainty, low-does extrapolation and the threshold hypothesis. J. Radiol. Prot. 2002; 22: A129–A135.
- 67K. H. Chadwick and H. P. Leenhouts, What can we say about the dose — effect relationship at very low doses? J. Radiol. Prot. 2002; 22: A155–A158.
- 68D. J. Higson, The bell should toll for the linear no-threshold model. J. Radiol. Prot. 2004; 24: 315–319.
- 69P. Dendy, Low dose radiation risk: UKRC 2004 debate. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005; 78: 1–2.
- 70K. H. Chadwick and H. P. Leenhouts, Radiation risk is linear with dose at low doses. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005; 78: 8–10.
- 71J. Cameron, Moderate dose rate ionising radiation increases longevity. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005; 78: 11–13.
- 72C. J. Martin, The LNT model provides the best approach for practical implementation of radiation protection. Brit. J. Radiol. 2005; 78: 14–16.
- 73E. G. Lubeck and W. D. Hazelton, Multistage carcogenesis and radiation. J. Radiol. Prot. 2002; 22: A43–A49.