Free Access
References
Saul Smilansky,
Saul Smilansky
Department of Philosophy at the University of Haifa, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorBook Author(s):Saul Smilansky,
Saul Smilansky
Department of Philosophy at the University of Haifa, Israel
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 16 November 2007
References
- Arneson, Richard (1989) Equality and equality of opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56, 77–93.
- Arneson, Richard (2000) Luck egalitarianism and prioritarianism. Ethics 110, 339–49.
-
Benatar, David
(2006)
Better Never to Have Been.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296422.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Brams, Steven J. (1976) Paradoxes in Politics. The Free Press, New York.
- Clark, Michael (1994) There is no paradox of blackmail. Analysis 54, 54–61.
-
Clark, Michael
(2002)
Paradoxes from A to Z.
Routledge, London.
10.4324/9780203465929 Google Scholar
- Cohen, G. A. (1989) On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99, 906–44.
- Cohen, L. Jonathan (1981) Who is starving whom? Theoria 47, 65–81.
-
Feinberg, Joel
(1988)
The paradox of blackmail.
Ratio Juris
11,
83–95.
10.1111/j.1467-9337.1988.tb00006.x Google Scholar
- Feinberg, Joel (1992) Wrongful life and the counterfactual element in harming. Freedom and Fulfilment. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Fletcher, George P. (1993) Blackmail: the paradigmatic crime. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141, 1617–38.
- Gawande, Atul (2004) The bell curve. New Yorker <http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/041206fa_fact>
- Goleman, Daniel (1985) Vital Lies, Simple Truths. Simon & Schuster, New York.
- Gorr, Michael (1992) Liberalism and the paradox of blackmail. Philo-sophy and Public Affairs 21, 43–66.
- Greenspan, Patricia S. (1980) A case of mixed feelings: ambivalence and the logic of emotion. In Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Explaining Emotions. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1970) Punishment and Responsibility. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Heyd, David (1992) Genethics. University of California Press, Berkeley.
- Hurka, Thomas (1993) Perfectionism. Oxford University Press, New York.
- James, William (1982) The moral equivalent of war. Essays in Religion and Morality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Kagan, Shelley (1989) The Limits of Morality. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Kamm, F. M. (1993) Morality, Mortality, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Kant, Immanuel (1986) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton as The Moral Law. Hutchinson, London.
- Kavka, Gregory S. (1987) Moral Paradoxes of Nuclear Deterrence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Klein, Martha
(1990)
Determinism, Blameworthiness and Deprivation.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198248347.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lenman, James (2007) Why I have no plans to retire: in defense of moderate professional complacency. Ratio, forthcoming.
- Levi, Primo (1987) If This is a Man. Abacus, London.
- Lindgren, James (1984) Unravelling the paradox of blackmail. Columbia Law Review 84, 670–717.
-
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper
(2004)
Smilansky's baseline objection to choice-egalitarianism.
SATS: Nordic Journal of Philosophy
5,
147–50.
10.1515/SATS.2004.147 Google Scholar
- Lukes, Steven (1985) Taking morality seriously. In Ted Honderich (ed.), Morality and Objectivity. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
- Mack, Eric (1982) In defense of blackmail. Philosophical Studies 41, 273–84.
- McMahan, Jeff (1985) Deterrence and deontology. In Russell Hardin, John J. Mearsheimer, Gerald Dworkin, and Robert E. Goodin (eds.), Nuclear Deterrence Ethics and Strategy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Manor, Tal (2005) Inequality: mind the gap! A reply to Smilansky's paradox of the baseline. Analysis 65, 265–8.
- Murphy, Jeffrie G. (1980) Blackmail: a preliminary inquiry. Monist 63, 156–71.
- Nagel, Thomas (1998) Concealment and exposure. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27, 3–30.
- New, Christopher (1992) Time and punishment. Analysis 52, 35–40.
- New, Christopher (1995) Punishing times: reply to Smilansky. Analysis 55, 60–2.
-
Olin, Doris
(2003)
Paradox.
Acumen, Chesham.
10.1515/9780773583740 Google Scholar
- Parfit, Derek (1984) Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Parfit, Derek (1986) Overpopulation and the quality of life. In Peter Singer (ed.), Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Poundstone, William (1990) Labyrinths of Reason. Anchor Books, New York.
-
Priest, Graham
(2006)
In Contradiction.
2nd edn.
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. (1976) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Rakowski, Eric (1991) Equal Justice. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- Rawls, John (2000) A Theory of Justice. Rev. edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- Rescher, Nicholas (2001) Paradoxes: Their Roots, Range, and Resolution. Open Court, Chicago.
- Sainsbury, R. M. (1996) Paradoxes. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Singer, Peter (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1, 229–43.
- Smilansky, Saul (1990) Utilitarianism and the “punishment” of the innocent: the general problem. Analysis 50, 29–33.
- Smilansky, Saul (1992) Two apparent paradoxes about justice and the severity of punishment. Southern Journal of Philosophy 30, 123–8.
- Smilansky, Saul (1994a) The ethical advantages of hard determinism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 355–63.
- Smilansky, Saul (1994b) Fortunate misfortune. Ratio 7, 153–63.
- Smilansky, Saul (1994c) On practicing what we preach. American Philosophical Quarterly 31, 73–9.
- Smilansky, Saul (1994d) The time to punish. Analysis 54, 50–3.
- Smilansky, Saul (1995a) May we stop worrying about blackmail? Analysis 55, 116–20.
- Smilansky, Saul (1995b) Nagel on the grounds for compensation. Public Affairs Quarterly 9, 63–73.
- Smilansky, Saul (1996a) Responsibility and desert: defending the connection. Mind 105, 157–63.
- Smilansky, Saul (1996b) The connection between responsibility and desert: the crucial distinction. Mind 105, 385–6.
- Smilansky, Saul (1997a) Egalitarian justice and the importance of the free will problem. Philosophia 25, 153–61.
- Smilansky, Saul (1997b) Preferring not to have been born. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75, 241–7.
-
Smilansky, Saul
(2000)
Free Will and Illusion.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/oso/9780198250180.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Smilansky, Saul (2001) Blackmail. Encyclopaedia of Ethics. 2nd edn. Routledge, London.
- Smilansky, Saul (2003) Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline. Analysis 63, 146–51.
-
Smilansky, Saul
(2004)
Reply to Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen on the paradox of the baseline.
SATS: Nordic Journal of Philosophy
5,
151–3.
10.1515/SATS.2004.151 Google Scholar
- Smilansky, Saul (2005a) On not being sorry about the morally bad. Philosophy 80, 261–5.
- Smilansky, Saul (2005b) The paradoxical relationship between morality and moral worth. Metaphilosophy 36, 490–500.
- Smilansky, Saul (2005c) The paradox of beneficial retirement. Ratio 18, 332–7.
- Smilansky, Saul (2005d) Choice-egalitarianism and the paradox of the baseline: a reply to Manor. Analysis 265, 333–7.
-
Smilansky, Saul
(2006a)
The paradox of moral complaint.
Utilitas,
18,
284–90.
10.1017/S0953820806002044 Google Scholar
- Smilansky, Saul (2006b) Some thoughts on terrorism, complaint, and the self-reflexive and relational nature of morality. Philosophia, 34, 65–74.
- Smilansky, Saul (2007) The paradox of beneficial retirement: a reply to Lenman. Ratio, forthcoming.
- Sorensen, Roy (2003) A Brief History of the Paradox. Oxford University Press, New York.
- Daniel Statman, ed. (1993) Moral Luck. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.
- Taylor, Shelley E. (1989) Positive Illusions. Basic Books, New York.
- Temkin, Larry S. (2003) Egalitarianism defended. Ethics 113, 764–82.
- Velleman, J. David (2000) Well-being and time. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
-
Williams, Bernard
(1973a)
Ethical consistency.
Problems of the Self.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511621253.013 Google Scholar
- Williams, Bernard (1973b) A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Williams, Bernard (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana, London.
-
Williams, Bernard
(1995)
Resenting one's own existence.
Making Sense of Humanity.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511621246 Google Scholar
