Chapter 28

Psychoanalytic Theories

Patrick J. Haggard

Patrick J. Haggard

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew C. Furman

Andrew C. Furman

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steven T. Levy

Steven T. Levy

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan E. Dunn

Jonathan E. Dunn

San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert M. Galatzer-Levy

Robert M. Galatzer-Levy

Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute, Chicago, IL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sybil A. Ginsburg

Sybil A. Ginsburg

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lawrence B. Inderbitzen

Lawrence B. Inderbitzen

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark E. James

Mark E. James

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Arnold D. Richards

Arnold D. Richards

New York Psychoanalytic Institute, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ralph E. Roughton

Ralph E. Roughton

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Beth Seelig

Beth Seelig

Emory University Psychoanalytic Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Henry F. Smith

Henry F. Smith

Psychoanalytic Institute of New England, Boston, MA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 April 2008

Summary

Originating over one hundred years ago, Freudian psychoanalytic theory has grown and developed into a broad and diverse constellation of theories of mind. These theories trace their origin to Freud and his explorations of the dynamic unconscious and the importance of internal conflict as the prime determinant of human psychological experience. Be it an emphasis on intrapsychic compromise, the relation of the maturing individual to internalized objects and external reality, or the role of the self in the formation of the psyche, modern psychoanalysis is concerned fundamentally with the often hidden but powerful interplay of psychic processes. Differences in theory are more of degree than of kind. Although different in dramatic ways from early Freudian theory, psychoanalysis continues to be a useful and vital tool in understanding the many vagaries and complexities of the human condition.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.