BACI Design†
Based in part on the article “BACI design” by Eric P. Smith, which appeared in the Encyclopedia of Environmetrics.
Abstract
The purpose of impact assessment is to evaluate whether a stressor has changed the environment, which components are adversely affected, and to estimate the magnitude of the effects. The evaluation of impact involves comparative methods. Early approaches to impact assessment involved the use of computer simulation models to predict the impact. Decisions were then made based on the soundness of those predictions. Although the data used to interpret effects are quite varied, the methods for analysis are often quite similar and involve comparison of impact areas with control areas. When information is available prior to the potential impact, the design is often referred to as a Before–After Control-impact (BACI) design. Several variations on the basic design have been proposed and are discussed in this article.
References
- 1 Underwood, A.J. (1991). Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations, Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42, 569–587.
- 2
Swartzman, G.,
Deriso, R., &
Cowan, C.
(1977).
Comparison of simulation models used in assessing the effects of power-plant-induced mortality on fish populations, in
Proceedings of the Conference Assessing Effects of Power-Plant-Induced Mortality on Fish Populations, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, May 3–6,
W. Winkel, ed,
Pergamon Press,
London.
10.1016/B978-0-08-021950-9.50029-6 Google Scholar
- 3 Mapstone, B.D. (1995). Scalable decision rules for environmental impact studies-effect size, Type I and Type II errors, Ecological Applications 5, 401–410.
- 4 Thomas, J.M., Mahaffey, J.A., Gore, K.L., & Watson, D.G. (1978). Statistical methods used to assess biological impact at nuclear power plants, Journal of Environmental Management 7, 260–290.
- 5 Green, R.H. (1979). Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester.
- 6 Hurlbert, S.J. (1984). Pseudo-replication and the design of ecological field experiments, Ecological Monographs 54, 187–211.
- 7 Eberhardt, L.L. (1976). Quantitative ecology and impact assessment, Journal of Environmental Management 4, 27–70.
- 8 Bernstein, B.B. & Zalenski, J. (1983). An optimum sampling design and power tests for environmental biologists, Journal of Environmental Management 30, 129–133.
- 9 Stewart-Oaten, A. (2008). Chance and randomness in design versus model-based approaches to impact assessment: comments on Bulleri et al. (2007), Environmental Conservation 35, 8–10.
- 10 Smith, E.P., Orvos, D.R., & Cairns, J.J. (1993). Impact assessment using the before-after-control-impact (BACI): Comments and concerns, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50, 627–637.
- 11 Ellis, J.I. & Schneider, D.C. (1997). Evaluation of a gradient sampling design for environmental impact assessment, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 48, 157–172.
- 12 Glasby, T.M. (1997). Analysing data from post-impact studies using asymmetrical analyses of variance: a case study of epibiota on marinas, Australian Journal of Ecology 22, 448–459.
- 13 Underwood, A.J. (1994). On beyond BACI: sampling designs that might reliably detect environmental disturbances, Ecological Applications 4, 3–15.
- 14 Mathur, D., Robbins, T.W., & Purdy, E.J. (1980). Assessment of thermal discharges on zooplankton in Conowingo Pond, Pennsylvania, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 37, 937–944.
- 15 Hollander, M. & Wolfe, D.A. (1973). Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
- 16 Skalski, J.R. & McKenzie, D.H. (1982). A design of aquatic monitoring systems, Journal of Environmental Management 14, 237–251.
- 17 Conner, M.M., Miller, M.W., Ebinger, M.R., & Burnham, K.P. (2007). A meta-BACI approach for evaluating management intervention on chronic wasting in mule deer, Ecological Applications 17, 140–153.
- 18 Benedetti-Cecchi, L. (2001). Beyond BACI: optimization of environmental sampling designs through monitoring and simulation, Ecological Applications 11, 783–799.
- 19 Lincoln-Smith, M.P., Pitt, K.A., Bell, J.D., & Mapstone, B.D. (2006). Using impact assessment methods to determine the effects of a marine reserve on abundances and sizes of valuable tropical invertebrates, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 63, 1251–1266.
- 20 Underwood, A.J. (1992). Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161, 145–178.
- 21 Stewart-Oaten, A. & Bence, J.R. (2001). Temporal and spatial variation in environmental assessment, Ecological Monographs 71, 305–339.
- 22 Bulleri, F., Underwood, A.J., & Benedetti-Ceechi, L. (2007). The assessment and interpretation of ecological impacts in human-dominated environments, Environmental Conservation 34, 181–182.
- 23 Bulleri, F., Underwood, A.J., & Benedetti-Ceechi, L. (2008). The analysis of ecological impacts in human-dominated environments: reply to Stewart-Oaten (2008), Environmental Conservation 35, 11–13.
- 24 Roberts, E.A. (1993). Seasonal cycles, environmental change and BACI designs, Environmetrics 4, 209–231.
- 25 Evans, J.C. & Coote, B.G. (1993). Matching sampling designs and significance tests in environmental studies, Environmetrics 4, 413–437.
- 26 Faith, D.P., Humphrey, C.L., & Dostine, P.L. (1991). Statistical power and BACI designs in biological monitoring: comparative evaluation of measures of community dissimilarity based on benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Rockhole Mine Creek, Northern Territory, Australia, Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42, 589–602.
- 27 Millard, S.P. & Lettenmaier, D.P. (1984). Optimal design of biological sampling programs using the analysis of variance, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 22, 637–656.
- 28 Murtaugh, P.A. (2000). Paired intervention analysis in ecology, Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 5, 280–292.
- 29 Murtaugh, P.A. (2002). One rejection rates of paired intervention analysis, Ecology 83, 1752–1761.
- 30 Stewart-Oaten, A. (2003). On rejection rates for paired intervention analysis: comment, Ecology 84, 2795–2799.
- 31 Murtaugh, P.A. (2003). On rejection rates for paired intervention analysis: reply, Ecology 84, 2799–2802.
- 32 Skalski, J.R. & Robson, D.S. (1992). Techniques for Wildlife Investigations: Design and Analysis of Capture Data, Academic Press, San Diego.
- 33 Kedwards, T.J., Maund, S.J., & Chapman, P.F. (1999). Community-level analysis of ecotoxicological field studies: II. Replicated design studies, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 18, 158–166.
- 34 Terlizzi, A., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Bevilacqua, S., Fraschetti, S., Guidetti, P., & Anderson, M.J. (2005). Multivariate and univariate asymmetrical analyses in environmental impact assessment: a case study of Mediterranean subtidal sessile assemblages, Marine Ecology Progress Series 289, 27–42.
- 35 Michener, W.K. (1997). Quantitatively evaluating restoration experiments: research design, statistical analysis, and data management considerations, Restoration Ecology 5, 324–337.
- 36 Wiens, J.A. & Parker, K.R. (1995). Analyzing the effects of accidental environmental impacts: Approaches and assumptions, Ecological Applications 5, 1069–1083.
- 37 Beyers, D.W. (1998). Causal inference in environmental impact studies, Journal of the North American Benthological Society 17, 367–373.
- 38 Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W.W., & Parker, K.R. (1986). Environmental impact assessment: pseudoreplication in time? Ecology 67, 929–940.