Perfusion-based segmentation of the human brain using similarity mapping
Marlene Wiart
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorNicolas Rognin
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yves Berthezene
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Hopital de la Croix Rousse, Service de Radiologie, 93 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France.===Search for more papers by this authorNorbert Nighoghossian
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorJean-Claude Froment
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorMarlene Wiart
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorNicolas Rognin
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yves Berthezene
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Hopital de la Croix Rousse, Service de Radiologie, 93 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France.===Search for more papers by this authorNorbert Nighoghossian
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorJean-Claude Froment
CREATIS, CNRS Research Unit (affiliated with INSERM), Lyon, France
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In this work, a method for segmenting human brain MR scans on the basis of perfusion is described. This technique uses a measure of similarity between the time-intensity curves obtained with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI and a modeled curve of reference to isolate a tissue of interest, such as white or gray matter. The aim of this study was to validate the method by performing segmentation of white and gray matter in six controls. The relative regional blood volume gray-to-white matter ratio was used as a criterion to assess the quality of segmentation. On average, this ratio was 2.1 ± 0.2, which is in good agreement with the literature, thus suggesting reliable segmentation. In the case of abnormal perfusion, time-intensity curves are different in shape than that of normal tissue. Therefore, this approach might allow the segmentation of pathological regions, and combined with an indicator-dilution analysis might offer new possibilities for characterizing a brain pathology. Magn Reson Med 45:261–268, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Siegal T, Rubinstein R, Tzuk-Shina T, Gomori JM. Utility of relative cerebral blood volume mapping derived from perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the routine follow-up of brain tumors. J Neurosurg 1997; 86: 22–27.
- 2 Reimer P, Bremer C, Horch C, Morgenroth C, Allkemper T, Schuierer G. MR-monitered LITT as a palliative concept in patients with high grade gliomas: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 240–244.
- 3 Baird AE, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 583–609.
- 4 Wu RH, Bruening R, Berchtenbreiter C, Weber J, Steiger HJ, Peller M, Penzkofer H, Reiser M. MRI assessment of cerebral blood volume in patients with brain infarcts. Neuroradiology 1998; 40: 496–502.
- 5 Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea JM, Brady TJ. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 249–265.
- 6 Lythoe DJ, Østergaard L, William SC, Cluckie A, Buxton-Thomas M, Simmons A, Markus HS. Quantitative perfusion imaging in carotid artery stenosis using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 1–11.
- 7 Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pells GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19: 701–735.
- 8 Schlaug G, Benfield A, Baird AE, Siewert B, Lovbald KO, Parker RA, Edelman RR, Warach S. The ischemic penumbra operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI. Neurology 1999; 53: 1528–1537.
- 9 Guckel F, Brix G, Schmiedek P, Piepgras Z, Becker G, Kopke J, Gross H, Georgi M. Cerebrovascular reserve capacity in patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease: assessment with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging and the acetazolamide test. Radiology 1996; 201: 405–412.
- 10 Schreiber WG, Guckel F, Strizke P, Schmiedek P, Schwartz A, Brix G. Cerebral blood flow and cerebrovascular reserve capacity: estimation by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998; 18: 1143–1156.
- 11 Rogowska J, Preston K, Hunter GJ, Hamberg L, Kwong K, Saloun O, Wolf GL. Applications of similarity mapping in dynamic MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1995; 14: 480–486.
- 12 Lo EH, Rogowska J, Bogorodzki P, Trocha M, Matsumoto K, Saffran B, Wolf GL Temporal correlation analysis of penumbral dynamics in focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16: 60–68.
- 13 Leenders KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Healy MJR, Gibbs JM, Wise RJ, Hatazawa J, Herold S. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. Brain 1990; 113: 27–47.
- 14 Ljung L, Gland J. Modeling of dynamic system. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Edition; 1987. p 1–12.
- 15 Fisher WD. On grouping for maximum homogeneity. JASA 1958; 53: 789–798.
- 16 Kluytmans M, van der Grond J, Folkers PJ, Mali WP, Viergever MA. Differentiation of gray matter and white matter perfusion in patients with unilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 767–774.
- 17 Kluytmans M, van der Grond J, Eikelboom BC, Viergever MA. Long-term hemodynamic effects of carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 1998; 29: 1567–1572.
- 18 Belliveau JW, Rosen BR, Kantor HL, Rzedzian RR, Kennedy DN, McKinstry RC, Vevea JM, Cohen MS, Pykett IL, Brady TJ. Functional cerebral imaging by susceptibility-contrast NMR. Magn Reson Med 1990; 14: 538–546.
- 19 Edelman RR, Mattle HP, Atkinson DJ, Hill T, Finn JP, Mayman C, Ronthal M, Hoogewoud HM, Kleefield J. Cerebral blood flow: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1990; 176: 211–220.
- 20 Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Buchbinder BR, McKinstry RC, Porkka LM, Kennedy DN, Neuder MS, Fisel CR, Aronen HJ, Kwong KK. Contrast agents and cerebral hemodynamics. Magn Reson Med 1991; 19: 285–292.
- 21 Zigun JR, Frank JA, Barrios FA, Jones DW, Foo TK, Moonen CT, Press DZ, Weinberger DR. Measurement of brain activity with bolus administration of contrast agent and gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186: 353–356.
- 22
Axel L.
Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis.
Radiology
1980;
137:
676–686.
10.1148/radiology.137.3.7003648 Google Scholar
- 23 Østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 715–725.
- 24 Østergaard L, Sorensen AG, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: experimental comparison and preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 726–736.
- 25 Roberts TP, Vexler Z, Derugin N, Moseley ME, Kucharczyk J. High-speed MR imaging of ischemic brain injury following stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1993; 13: 940–946.