Volume 43, Issue 6 pp. 896-900
Note

A protocol for assessing subtraction errors of arterial spin-tagging perfusion techniques in human brain

Martin N. Yongbi

Martin N. Yongbi

Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Charlene X. Tan

Charlene X. Tan

Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph A. Frank

Joseph A. Frank

Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Jeff H. Duyn

Corresponding Author

Jeff H. Duyn

Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Laboratory of Diagnostic Radiology Research, CC, NIH, Building 10, Room B1N256, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892===Search for more papers by this author

This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.

Abstract

A protocol for assessing signal contributions from static tissue (subtraction errors) in perfusion images acquired with arterial spin-labeling (ASL) techniques in human brain is proposed. The method exploits the reduction of blood T1 caused by the clinically available paramagnetic contrast agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA). The protocol is demonstrated clinically with multislice FAIR images acquired before, during, and after Gd-DTPA administration using a range of selective inversion widths. Perfusion images acquired postcontrast for selective inversion widths large enough (threshold) to avoid interaction with the imaging slice had signal intensities reduced to noise level, as opposed to subtraction errors manifested on images acquired using inversion widths below the threshold. The need for these experiments to be performed in vivo is further illustrated by comparison with phantom results. The protocol allows a one-time calibration of relevant ASL parameters (e.g., selective inversion widths) in vivo, which may otherwise cause subtraction errors. Magn Reson Med 43:896–900, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.