Volume 23, Issue 8 pp. 1194-1203
Research Article

Dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials to painful and nonpainful median nerve stimulation

Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L. go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L. go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, ItalySearch for more papers by this author
Domenica Le Pera MD

Domenica Le Pera MD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, L. go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy

Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
David Niddam DSc

David Niddam DSc

Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Arendt-Nielsen DSc, PhD

Lars Arendt-Nielsen DSc, PhD

Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew C.N. Chen PhD

Andrew C.N. Chen PhD

Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction (SMI), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Dipolar source modeling might help in clarifying whether somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after electrical stimulation at painful intensity contain any information related to the nociceptive processing. SEPs were recorded after left median nerve stimulation at three different intensities: intense but nonpainful (intensity 2); slightly painful (pain threshold; intensity 4); and moderately painful (intensity 6). Scalp SEPs at intensities 2, 4, and 6 were fitted by a five-dipole model. When the strength modifications of the source activities up to 40 ms were examined across the different stimulus intensities, no significant difference was found. In the later epoch (40–200 ms), a posterior parietal dipole and two bilateral sources probably located in the second somatosensory (SII) areas increased significantly their dipole moments when the stimulus was increased from 2 to 4 and became painful. Since no difference was found when the stimulus intensity was increased from 4 to 6, the observed increase of the dipolar strengths is probably related to a variation of the stimulus quality (nonpainful vs. painful), rather than of the stimulus intensity per se. Our findings lead us to conclude that a large convergence of nociceptive and non-nociceptive afferents probably occurs bilaterally in the SII areas. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 23: 1194–1203, 2000

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me