Meglitinides: Basic Aspects and Clinical Uses
M.J. Davies
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
Search for more papers by this authorSudesna Chatterjee
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
Search for more papers by this authorM.J. Davies
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
Search for more papers by this authorSudesna Chatterjee
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The meglitinides offer an opportunity to target specifically the postprandial hyperglycemia that occurs commonly in patients with type 2 diabetes. Their rapid onset and short duration of action leads to more “physiological” release of insulin and partially restores the pattern of postprandial insulin secretion that is defective in type 2 diabetes mellitus. This potentially allows tighter glycemic control while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. As prandial glucose regulators they allow flexible dosing such that a tablet need only be taken before a patient has a meal. Repaglinide in particular has been shown to reduce HbA1c and is well-tolerated by patients both as monotherapy and in combination with other agents. It appears to have some advantages from head-to-head studies with sulfonylureas. Nateglinide appears to produce a faster early-phase insulin response that gives it the potential to produce less hypoglycemia, but randomized controlled trials in comparison with sulfonylureas are lacking. Both agents are more expensive than sulfonylureas. Formal data regarding cost-effectiveness are not currently available. However, their flexible administration may be of benefit in certain subgroups such as shift-workers and those with flexible lifestyles. Efficacy in early diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance is currently being investigated. The ability to flexibly dose with these agents makes them useful in patients with flexible lifestyles. Macrovascular and microvascular outcome data for the meglitinides are awaited.
References
- 1 Amos AF, McCarty DJ, Zimmet P. The rising global burden of diabetes and its complications: estimates and projections to the year 2010. Diabet Med 1997; 14 (suppl 5): 1–85.
- 2 Takiya L, Chawla S. Therapeutic options for the management of type 2 diabetes. Am J Manag Care 2002; 8 (11): 1009–23.
- 3 The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas compared with conventional treatment and risks of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837–53.
- 4 Chiasson JL, Josse RG, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Karasik A, Laakso M, for the STOP-NIDDM Trail Research Group. Acarbose for prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the STOP-NIDDM randomised trial. Lancet June 2002; 359 (9323): 2072–7.
- 5 Davies MJ, Rajman G, Grenfell A, Gray IP, Day JL, Males CN. Loss of the first phase insulin response to intravenous glucose in subjects with persistent impaired glucose tolerance. Diabet Med 1994; 11: 432–6.
- 6 Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Invest 1999; 104: 789–94.
- 7 The UKPDS group. UKPDS 16. Overview of 6 years therapy of Type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes 1995; 44: 1249–58.
- 8 Avignon A, Radauceanu A, Monnier L. Non-fasting glucose is a better marker of diabetes control than fasting plasma glucose in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1822–6.
- 9 Erlinger TP, Brancati FL. Postchallenge hyperglycaemia in a national sample of US adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1734–8.
- 10 DECODE Study Group on behalf of the European Diabetes Epidemiology Study Group. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. Lancet 1999; 354: 617–21.
- 11 Balkau B, Shipley M, Jarrett RJ, Pyorala K, Pyorala M, Forhan A, Eschwege E. High blood glucose concentration is a risk factor for mortality in middle-aged nondiabetic men. 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study. Diabetes Care 1998; 21 (3): 360–7.
- 12 de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Ruhe HG, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, Heine RJ. Hyperglycaemia is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn population: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia 1999; 42 (8): 926–31.
- 13 Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U, Schulze J, Schwanebeck U, Schmechel H, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: The Diabetes Intervention Study (DIS), 11-year follow-up. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 1577–83.
- 14 Donahue RP, Abbot RD, Reed DM, Yano K. Post-challenge glucose concentration and coronary heart disease in men of Japanese ancestry. Honolulu Heart Program. Diabetes 1987; 36: 689–92.
- 15
Ceriello A.
The emerging role of post prandial hyperglycaemic spikes in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications.
Diabet Med
1998;
15:
188–93.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199803)15:3<188::AID-DIA545>3.0.CO;2-V CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 16 Pradhan AD, Manson JAE, Rifai N, et al. C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and risk of developing T2DM. JAMA 2001; 286: 327–34.
- 17 Esposito K, Nappo F, Marfella R, et al. Inflammatory cytokine concentrations are acutely increased by hyperglycaemia in humans—role of oxidative stress. Circulation 2002; 106: 2067–72.
- 18 De Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, Asrat T, Toohey JS, Lien JM, Evans AT. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1239–41.
- 19 American Diabetes Association. Postprandial blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 775–8.
- 20 Hu S, Wang S, Fanelli B, Bell PA, Dunning BE, Geisse S, Schmitz R, Boettcher BR. Pancreatic B-cell K-ATP channel activity and membrane-binding studies with nateglinide: a comparison with sulfonylurcas and repaglinide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000; 293: 444–52.
- 21 Fuhlendorff J, Rorsman P, Kofod H, et al. Stimulation of insulin release by repaglinide and glibenclamide involves both common and distinct processes. Diabetes 1998; 47: 345–51.
- 22 Tankova T, Koev D, Dakovska L, Kirilov G. The effect of repaglinide on insulin secretion and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003; 59: 43–9.
- 23 Hu S, Wang S, Dunning BE. Glucose-dependent and glucose-sensitising insulinotropic effect of nateglinide: a comparison to sulfonylureas and repaglinide. Int J Exp Diabetes Res 2001; 2 (1): 63–72.
- 24 Kalbag J, Hirschberg Y, Mcleod JF, Garrefta S, Lassetes K. Comparison of Mealtime glucose regulation by nateglinide and repaglinide in healthy subjects. Diabetes 1999 (suppl 1): Abstract 106.
- 25 Massi-Benedetti M, Damsbo P. Pharmacology and clinical experience with repaglinide. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 2000; 9 (4): 885–98.
- 26 Devineni D, Walter YH, Smith HT, Lee JS, Prasad P, McLeod JF. Pharmacokinetics of nateglinide in renally impaired diabetic patients. J Clin Pharmacol 2003; 43 (2): 163–70.
- 27 Moses RG, Gomis R, Frandsen KB, et al. Flexible meal-related dosing with repaglinide facilitates glycaemic control in therapy-naive type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 11–5.
- 28 Van Gaal LF, Van Acker KL, De Leeuw IH. Repaglinide improves blood glucose control in sulphonylurea-naïve type 2 diabetes. Diab Res Clin Pract 2001; 53: 141–8.
- 29 Madsbad S, Kilhovd B, Lager I, et al. Comparison between repaglinide and glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1 year multicenter study. Diabet Med 2001; 18: 395–401.
- 30 Marbury T, Huang WC, Strange P, Lebovitz H. Repaglinide versus glyburide: a one year comparison trial. Diab Res Clin Pract 1999; 43: 155–66.
- 31 Moses R, Siobodniuk R, Boyages S, Colagiuri S, et al. Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999; 22 (1): 119–24.
- 32 Landgraf R, Frank M, Bauer C, Dieken ML. Prandial glucose regulation with repaglinide: it's clinical and lifestyle impact in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24 (suppl 3): 38–44.
- 33 Yki-Jarvinen H, Ryysy L, Nikkila K, et al. Comparison of betime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 389–96.
- 34 Davies MJ, Johnston V, Howe J, et al. Comparison of combination regimes of insulin, repaglinide and metformin in type 2 diabetes: an interim analysis. Diabet Med 2001; 18 (suppl 2): A 44.
- 35 Hanefeld M, Bouter KP, Dickinson S, Guitard C. Rapid and short-acting mealtime insulin secretion with nateglinide controls both prandial and mean glycaemia. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 202–7.
- 36 Hollander P, Schwartz SL, Gatlin MR, et al. Nateglinide but not glyburide, selectively enhances early insulin release and more effectively controls post-meal glucose excursions with less insulin exposure. Diabetes 2000; 49: 449.
- 37 Carroll F, Izard A, Riboni K, Burge MR, et al. Control of postprandial hyperglycaemia. Optimal use of short-acting insulin secretagogues. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 2147–52.
- 38 Horton E, Clinkingbeard C, Gatlin M, et al. Nateglinide alone and in combination with metformin improves glycaemic control by reducing mealtime glucose levels in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000; 23: 1660–5.
- 39 Marre M, Van Gaal L, Usadel K-H, Ball M, Whatmough I, Guitard C. Nateglinide improves glycaemic control when added to metformin monotherapy: results of a randomized trial with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2002; 4: 177–86.
- 40 Rosenstock J, Shen SG, Gatlin MR, Foley JE. Combination therapy with nateglinide and a thiazolidinedione improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 1529–33.
- 41 Davies MJ. Insulin secretagogues. Curr Med Res Opin 2002; 18 (suppl 1): S 22–30.
- 42 Dornhorst A. Insulinotropic meglitinides analogues. Lancet 2001; 358: 1709–16.