MR imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium†
Corresponding Author
Brian A. Hargreaves
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
210 Packard Electrical Engineering Building, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9510.===Search for more papers by this authorGarry E. Gold
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Search for more papers by this authorPhilipp K. Lang
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorSteven M. Conolly
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorJohn M. Pauly
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorGabrielle Bergman
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorJan Vandevenne
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorDwight G. Nishimura
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Brian A. Hargreaves
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
210 Packard Electrical Engineering Building, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-9510.===Search for more papers by this authorGarry E. Gold
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.
Search for more papers by this authorPhilipp K. Lang
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorSteven M. Conolly
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorJohn M. Pauly
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorGabrielle Bergman
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorJan Vandevenne
Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorDwight G. Nishimura
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Search for more papers by this authorA preliminary account of this work was presented at the 6th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Sydney, 1998 (abstract 1067).
Abstract
The high incidence of osteoarthritis and the recent advent of several new surgical and non-surgical treatment approaches have motivated the development of quantitative techniques to assess cartilage loss. Although magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most accurate non-invasive diagnostic modality for evaluating articular cartilage, improvements in spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) would be valuable. Cartilage presents an imaging challenge due to its short T2 relaxation time and its low water content compared with surrounding materials. Current methods sacrifice cartilage signal brightness for contrast between cartilage and surrounding tissue such as bone, bone marrow, and joint fluid. A new technique for imaging articular cartilage uses driven equilibrium Fourier transform (DEFT), a method of enhancing signal strength without waiting for full T1 recovery. Compared with other methods, DEFT imaging provides a good combination of bright cartilage and high contrast between cartilage and surrounding tissue. Both theoretical predictions and images show that DEFT is a valuable method for imaging articular cartilage when compared with spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (SPGR) or fast spin echo (FSE). The cartilage SNR for DEFT is as high as that of either FSE or SPGR, while the cartilage-synovial fluid CNR of DEFT is as much as four times greater than that of FSE or SPGR. Implemented as a three-dimensional sequence, DEFT can achieve coverage comparable to that of other sequences in a similar scan time. Magn Reson Med 42:695–703, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1 Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Resnick D. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Orthop Clin North Am 1990; 21: 561–572. Medline
- 2 Mink J, Deutsch AL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Clin Orthop 1989; 244: 29–47. Medline
- 3 Spiers AS, Meagher T, Ostlere SJ, Wilson DJ, Dodd CA. Can MRI of the knee affect arthroscopic practice? A prospective study of 58 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75: 49–52.
- 4 Ruwe PA, Wright J, Randall RL, Lynch JK, Jokl P, McCarthy S. Can MR imaging effectively replace diagnostic arthroscopy? Radiology 1992; 183: 335–339. Medline
- 5 Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, Fuchs MD, Ratner LM, Wirth CR, Hospodar PP. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 127–132. Medline
- 6 Peterfy CG, Majumdar S, Lang P, van Dijke CF, Sack K, Genant HK. MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. Radiology 1994; 191: 413–419. Medline
- 7 Rubenstein JD, Li JG, Majumdar S, Henkelman RM. Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 1089–1096. Medline
- 8 Hajek PC, Sartoris DJ, Neumann CH, Resnick D. Potential contrast agents for MR arthrography: in vitro evalation and practical observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 97–104. Medline
- 9 Hajek PC, Baker LL, Sartoris DJ, Neumann CH, Resnick D. MR arthrography: anatomic-pathalogic investigation. Radiology 1987; 163: 141–147. Medline
- 10 Recht MP, Resnick D. MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 283–290. Medline
- 11 Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996; 198: 209–212. Medline
- 12 Yao L, Shantanu S, Seeger LL. MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 339–345. Medline
- 13 Disler DG, Peters TL, Muscoreil SJ, Ratner LM, Wagle WA, Cousins JP, Rifkin MD. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 887–892. Medline
- 14 Fellner C, Geissler A, Held P, Strotzer M, Treibel W, Fellner F. Signal, contrast, and resolution in optimized PD- and T2-weighted turbo SE images of the knee. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 96–105. Medline
- 15 Bashir A, Gray ML, Burstein D. Gd-DTPA2− as a measure of cartilage degradation. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36: 665–673. Medline
- 16 Bashir A, Gray ML, Boutin RD, Burstein D. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd-DTPA2− enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 205: 551–558. Medline
- 17 Reddy R, Insko EK, Noyszewski EA, Dandora R, Kneeland JB, Leigh JS. Sodium MRI of human articular cartilage in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 697–701. Medline
- 18 Woolf SD, Chesnick FS, Frank JA, Lim KO, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer contrast: MR imaging of the knee. Radiology 1991; 179: 623–628. Medline
- 19 Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D, Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 329–335. Medline
- 20 Gold GE, Butts K, Fechner KP, Bergman G, Beaulieu CF, Lang PK, Macovski A. In vivo diffusion-weighted imaging of cartilage. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM 6th Annual Meeting, Sydney, 1998. p 1066.
- 21 Becker ED, Ferretti JA. Driven equilibrium fourier transform spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 1969; 91: 7784–7785. Medline
- 22 Shoup RR, Becker ED. The driven equilibrium fourier transform NMR technique: an experimental study. J Magn Reson 1972; 8: 298–310.
- 23 Iwaoka H, Sugiyama T, Matsuura H, Fujino K. A new pulse sequency for “fast recovery” fast-scan NMR imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1984; 3: 41–46.
- 24 van Uijen CMJ, den Boef JH. Driven-equilibrium radiofrequency pulses in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med 1984; 1: 502–507. Medline
- 25 Maki J, Johnson GA, Cofer GP, MacFall JR. SNR improvement in NMR microscopy using DEFT. J Magn Reson 1988; 80: 482–492.
- 26 Brittain JH, Hu BS, Wright GA, Meyer CH, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Coronary angiography with magnetization-prepared T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33: 689–696. Medline
- 27 Duewell SH, Ceckler TL, Ong K, Wen H, Jaffer FA, Chesnick SA, Balaban RS. Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 4 T and at 1.5 T: comparison of relaxation times and image contrast. Radiology 1995; 196: 551–555. Medline
- 28 Henkelman RM, Stanisz GJ, Kim JK, Bronskill MJ. Anisotropy of NMR properties of tissues. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 592–601. Medline
- 29 van der Meulen P, Groen JP, Tinus AMC, Bruntink G. Fast field echo imaging: an overview and contrast calculations. Magn Reson Imaging 1988; 6: 355–368. Medline
- 30 Luk-Pat GT. Fast magnetic resonance imaging techniques for cardiovascular disease. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1998.
- 31 Mandeville JB, Weisskoff RM, Garrido L. Reduction of eddy-current induced nyquist ghosts and sampling artifact. In: Proceedings of the SMR 3rd Annual Meeting, Nice, 1995. p 613.
- 32 Noll DC, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Homodyne detection in magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991; 10: 154–163.
- 33 Oshio K, Williamson DS, Winalski CS, Miyamoto S, Kosugi S, Suzuki K. Fast recovery RARE for knee imaging. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM 6th Annual Meeting, Sydney, 1998. p 1090.
- 34 Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Lang PK, Bergman G, Conolly SM, Nishimura DG. Imaging of articular cartilage using DEFT. In: Proceedings of the ISMRM 6th Annual Meeting, Sydney, 1998. p 1067.
- 35 Waldschmidt JG, Rilling RJ, Kajdacsy-Balla AA, Boynton MD, Erickson SJ. In vitro and in vivo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: zonal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 1997; 17: 1387–1402. Medline
- 36 Erickson SJ. High-resolution imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiology 1997; 205: 593–618. Medline
- 37 Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Morava-Protzner I, Stanchev PL, Henkelman RM. Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. Radiology 1993; 188: 219–226. Medline
- 38 Mlynarik V, Degrassi A, Toffanin R, Vittur F, Cova M, Pozzi-Mucelli RS. Investigation of laminar appearance of articular cartilage by means of magnetic resonance microscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 14: 435–442. Medline