Volume 23, Issue 3 pp. 353-360
Main Article

Central scalp projection of the N30 SEP source activity after median nerve stimulation

Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Massimiliano Valeriani MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Istituto di Neurologia, Policlinico A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, ItalySearch for more papers by this author
Domenico Restuccia MD

Domenico Restuccia MD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Barba MD

Carmen Barba MD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Pietro Tonali MD

Pietro Tonali MD

Department of Neurology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
François Mauguière MD, PhD

François Mauguière MD, PhD

Functional Neurology and Epileptology Department, Hôpital Neurologique, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Conflicting results have been reported about abnormalities of the N30 somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) in movement disorders. In these studies, the N30 amplitude was measured in the frontal scalp region. Our aim was to identify the scalp electrodes recording the genuine activity of the N30 generator. In 18 subjects, we recorded the scalp SEPs from 19 electrodes and found a negative potential around 30 ms reaching its maximal amplitude in the frontal region. However, neither simple visual inspection of the frontal traces nor topographic analysis could distinguish the N24 from the N30 component of the frontal negativity. Brain electrical source analysis of SEPs showed that a four dipolar source model could well explain the scalp SEP distribution. We calculated the scalp field distributions of the source activities as modeled from the scalp recordings and observed that the maximal field distribution reflecting the activity of the N30 source was in the central region, whereas that reflecting the N24 source activity was frontal. We conclude that the negative response recorded around 30 ms in the central traces represents “genuine” N30 source activity, whereas the frontal negativity, which is higher in amplitude, is a mixture of the activities of both the N30 and N24 sources. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 23: 353–360, 2000

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me