Volume 21, Issue 4 pp. 439-453

Presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms underlying H-reflex changes produced by a selective voluntary contraction

Michele Abbruzzese MD

Michele Abbruzzese MD

Department of Neurogical Sciences, University of Genoa, Via De Toni 5, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Lizia Reni MD

Lizia Reni MD

Department of Neurogical Sciences, University of Genoa, Via De Toni 5, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Cinzia Minatel MD

Cinzia Minatel MD

Department of Neurogical Sciences, University of Genoa, Via De Toni 5, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Emilio Favale MD

Corresponding Author

Emilio Favale MD

Department of Neurogical Sciences, University of Genoa, Via De Toni 5, 16132 Genoa, Italy

Department of Neurogical Sciences, University of Genoa, Via De Toni 5, 16132 Genoa, ItalySearch for more papers by this author

Abstract

Concurrent recordings of (i) the soleus H reflex and (ii) the underlying afferent (P1) and efferent (P2) neural volleys were performed during a protracted, moderate, isometric, voluntary contraction of the soleus (S) muscle, and the subsequent release period. Besides the expected enhancement of the H reflex, muscular contraction caused a significant reduction in the corresponding central delay (as extrapolated from variations of P1–P2 interval), while the opposite trend occurred during the release phase. Control experiments, based on (a) neural blockade below the stimulation site, (b) muscle stretching at the end of the muscular contraction, (c) changes in amplitude of homonymous and heteronymous S responses, and (d) variations in effectiveness of homonymous and heteronymous conditioning volleys on the S motoneuronal pool, showed that both voluntary contraction and the subsequent release period are associated with a reduced effectiveness of Ia afferents, while postsynaptic motoneuronal responsiveness is significantly modified only during the actual contraction time. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve 21:439–453, 1998.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me