Volume 58, Issue 1 pp. 19-25
Full Access

Cellular immune response of ducks to duck hepatitis B virus infection

Karen Vickery

Corresponding Author

Karen Vickery

Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia===Search for more papers by this author
Yvonne Cossart

Yvonne Cossart

Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Dixon

Robert Dixon

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) has been a useful model for hepadnavirus infection. There have been few studies on immunity to DHBV and none describing the cell-mediated immune response by acute and chronically infected ducks. A duck hepatitis B antigen-specific blastogenesis assay was used to measure DHBV antigen-specific responses of duck peripheral blood (PBMC) and splenic mononuclear cells (SMCs) from uninfected control ducks, ducks acutely or chronically infected with DHBV, and ducks immune to DHBV. A comparison of the group mean responses by PBMC to DHBV surface antigen (DHBsAg) found that the immune group was significantly different to the other three groups (controls or unexposed, P < 0.0001; acutely infected, P < 0.01; chronically infected, P < 0.01). The responses to DHBsAg by PBMC of the acute group (P < 0.01) were significantly different also to that of the unexposed group. For DHBV core antigen (DHBcAg), significant differences in the responses were found between immune ducks and unexposed (P < 0.0005) and acutely infected (P < 0.05) groups. The SMC showed a significant difference between unexposed ducks and immune ducks (P < 0.05) in the group mean responses to DHBsAg. The responses to DHBcAg were significantly different between the immune group and the acute (P < 0.01) and unexposed (P < 0.01) groups. The group mean of unexposed ducks was also significantly different to that of acutely infected ducks (P < 0.01). This study indicates that the cellular immune response in immune animals differs from acutely and chronically infected ducks. Further studies of these differences may provide some explanations for the differing outcomes of DHBV infection. J. Med. Virol. 58:19–25, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.